Old engine for Continuous Time Bayesian Networks. Superseded by reCTBN. 🐍
https://github.com/madlabunimib/PyCTBN
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
752 lines
28 KiB
752 lines
28 KiB
"""=============================
|
|
Subclassing ndarray in python
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
Subclassing ndarray is relatively simple, but it has some complications
|
|
compared to other Python objects. On this page we explain the machinery
|
|
that allows you to subclass ndarray, and the implications for
|
|
implementing a subclass.
|
|
|
|
ndarrays and object creation
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
Subclassing ndarray is complicated by the fact that new instances of
|
|
ndarray classes can come about in three different ways. These are:
|
|
|
|
#. Explicit constructor call - as in ``MySubClass(params)``. This is
|
|
the usual route to Python instance creation.
|
|
#. View casting - casting an existing ndarray as a given subclass
|
|
#. New from template - creating a new instance from a template
|
|
instance. Examples include returning slices from a subclassed array,
|
|
creating return types from ufuncs, and copying arrays. See
|
|
:ref:`new-from-template` for more details
|
|
|
|
The last two are characteristics of ndarrays - in order to support
|
|
things like array slicing. The complications of subclassing ndarray are
|
|
due to the mechanisms numpy has to support these latter two routes of
|
|
instance creation.
|
|
|
|
.. _view-casting:
|
|
|
|
View casting
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
*View casting* is the standard ndarray mechanism by which you take an
|
|
ndarray of any subclass, and return a view of the array as another
|
|
(specified) subclass:
|
|
|
|
>>> import numpy as np
|
|
>>> # create a completely useless ndarray subclass
|
|
>>> class C(np.ndarray): pass
|
|
>>> # create a standard ndarray
|
|
>>> arr = np.zeros((3,))
|
|
>>> # take a view of it, as our useless subclass
|
|
>>> c_arr = arr.view(C)
|
|
>>> type(c_arr)
|
|
<class 'C'>
|
|
|
|
.. _new-from-template:
|
|
|
|
Creating new from template
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
New instances of an ndarray subclass can also come about by a very
|
|
similar mechanism to :ref:`view-casting`, when numpy finds it needs to
|
|
create a new instance from a template instance. The most obvious place
|
|
this has to happen is when you are taking slices of subclassed arrays.
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
>>> v = c_arr[1:]
|
|
>>> type(v) # the view is of type 'C'
|
|
<class 'C'>
|
|
>>> v is c_arr # but it's a new instance
|
|
False
|
|
|
|
The slice is a *view* onto the original ``c_arr`` data. So, when we
|
|
take a view from the ndarray, we return a new ndarray, of the same
|
|
class, that points to the data in the original.
|
|
|
|
There are other points in the use of ndarrays where we need such views,
|
|
such as copying arrays (``c_arr.copy()``), creating ufunc output arrays
|
|
(see also :ref:`array-wrap`), and reducing methods (like
|
|
``c_arr.mean()``).
|
|
|
|
Relationship of view casting and new-from-template
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
These paths both use the same machinery. We make the distinction here,
|
|
because they result in different input to your methods. Specifically,
|
|
:ref:`view-casting` means you have created a new instance of your array
|
|
type from any potential subclass of ndarray. :ref:`new-from-template`
|
|
means you have created a new instance of your class from a pre-existing
|
|
instance, allowing you - for example - to copy across attributes that
|
|
are particular to your subclass.
|
|
|
|
Implications for subclassing
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
If we subclass ndarray, we need to deal not only with explicit
|
|
construction of our array type, but also :ref:`view-casting` or
|
|
:ref:`new-from-template`. NumPy has the machinery to do this, and this
|
|
machinery that makes subclassing slightly non-standard.
|
|
|
|
There are two aspects to the machinery that ndarray uses to support
|
|
views and new-from-template in subclasses.
|
|
|
|
The first is the use of the ``ndarray.__new__`` method for the main work
|
|
of object initialization, rather then the more usual ``__init__``
|
|
method. The second is the use of the ``__array_finalize__`` method to
|
|
allow subclasses to clean up after the creation of views and new
|
|
instances from templates.
|
|
|
|
A brief Python primer on ``__new__`` and ``__init__``
|
|
=====================================================
|
|
|
|
``__new__`` is a standard Python method, and, if present, is called
|
|
before ``__init__`` when we create a class instance. See the `python
|
|
__new__ documentation
|
|
<https://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html#object.__new__>`_ for more detail.
|
|
|
|
For example, consider the following Python code:
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
class C:
|
|
def __new__(cls, *args):
|
|
print('Cls in __new__:', cls)
|
|
print('Args in __new__:', args)
|
|
# The `object` type __new__ method takes a single argument.
|
|
return object.__new__(cls)
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, *args):
|
|
print('type(self) in __init__:', type(self))
|
|
print('Args in __init__:', args)
|
|
|
|
meaning that we get:
|
|
|
|
>>> c = C('hello')
|
|
Cls in __new__: <class 'C'>
|
|
Args in __new__: ('hello',)
|
|
type(self) in __init__: <class 'C'>
|
|
Args in __init__: ('hello',)
|
|
|
|
When we call ``C('hello')``, the ``__new__`` method gets its own class
|
|
as first argument, and the passed argument, which is the string
|
|
``'hello'``. After python calls ``__new__``, it usually (see below)
|
|
calls our ``__init__`` method, with the output of ``__new__`` as the
|
|
first argument (now a class instance), and the passed arguments
|
|
following.
|
|
|
|
As you can see, the object can be initialized in the ``__new__``
|
|
method or the ``__init__`` method, or both, and in fact ndarray does
|
|
not have an ``__init__`` method, because all the initialization is
|
|
done in the ``__new__`` method.
|
|
|
|
Why use ``__new__`` rather than just the usual ``__init__``? Because
|
|
in some cases, as for ndarray, we want to be able to return an object
|
|
of some other class. Consider the following:
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
class D(C):
|
|
def __new__(cls, *args):
|
|
print('D cls is:', cls)
|
|
print('D args in __new__:', args)
|
|
return C.__new__(C, *args)
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, *args):
|
|
# we never get here
|
|
print('In D __init__')
|
|
|
|
meaning that:
|
|
|
|
>>> obj = D('hello')
|
|
D cls is: <class 'D'>
|
|
D args in __new__: ('hello',)
|
|
Cls in __new__: <class 'C'>
|
|
Args in __new__: ('hello',)
|
|
>>> type(obj)
|
|
<class 'C'>
|
|
|
|
The definition of ``C`` is the same as before, but for ``D``, the
|
|
``__new__`` method returns an instance of class ``C`` rather than
|
|
``D``. Note that the ``__init__`` method of ``D`` does not get
|
|
called. In general, when the ``__new__`` method returns an object of
|
|
class other than the class in which it is defined, the ``__init__``
|
|
method of that class is not called.
|
|
|
|
This is how subclasses of the ndarray class are able to return views
|
|
that preserve the class type. When taking a view, the standard
|
|
ndarray machinery creates the new ndarray object with something
|
|
like::
|
|
|
|
obj = ndarray.__new__(subtype, shape, ...
|
|
|
|
where ``subdtype`` is the subclass. Thus the returned view is of the
|
|
same class as the subclass, rather than being of class ``ndarray``.
|
|
|
|
That solves the problem of returning views of the same type, but now
|
|
we have a new problem. The machinery of ndarray can set the class
|
|
this way, in its standard methods for taking views, but the ndarray
|
|
``__new__`` method knows nothing of what we have done in our own
|
|
``__new__`` method in order to set attributes, and so on. (Aside -
|
|
why not call ``obj = subdtype.__new__(...`` then? Because we may not
|
|
have a ``__new__`` method with the same call signature).
|
|
|
|
The role of ``__array_finalize__``
|
|
==================================
|
|
|
|
``__array_finalize__`` is the mechanism that numpy provides to allow
|
|
subclasses to handle the various ways that new instances get created.
|
|
|
|
Remember that subclass instances can come about in these three ways:
|
|
|
|
#. explicit constructor call (``obj = MySubClass(params)``). This will
|
|
call the usual sequence of ``MySubClass.__new__`` then (if it exists)
|
|
``MySubClass.__init__``.
|
|
#. :ref:`view-casting`
|
|
#. :ref:`new-from-template`
|
|
|
|
Our ``MySubClass.__new__`` method only gets called in the case of the
|
|
explicit constructor call, so we can't rely on ``MySubClass.__new__`` or
|
|
``MySubClass.__init__`` to deal with the view casting and
|
|
new-from-template. It turns out that ``MySubClass.__array_finalize__``
|
|
*does* get called for all three methods of object creation, so this is
|
|
where our object creation housekeeping usually goes.
|
|
|
|
* For the explicit constructor call, our subclass will need to create a
|
|
new ndarray instance of its own class. In practice this means that
|
|
we, the authors of the code, will need to make a call to
|
|
``ndarray.__new__(MySubClass,...)``, a class-hierarchy prepared call to
|
|
``super(MySubClass, cls).__new__(cls, ...)``, or do view casting of an
|
|
existing array (see below)
|
|
* For view casting and new-from-template, the equivalent of
|
|
``ndarray.__new__(MySubClass,...`` is called, at the C level.
|
|
|
|
The arguments that ``__array_finalize__`` receives differ for the three
|
|
methods of instance creation above.
|
|
|
|
The following code allows us to look at the call sequences and arguments:
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
|
|
class C(np.ndarray):
|
|
def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
|
|
print('In __new__ with class %s' % cls)
|
|
return super(C, cls).__new__(cls, *args, **kwargs)
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
|
# in practice you probably will not need or want an __init__
|
|
# method for your subclass
|
|
print('In __init__ with class %s' % self.__class__)
|
|
|
|
def __array_finalize__(self, obj):
|
|
print('In array_finalize:')
|
|
print(' self type is %s' % type(self))
|
|
print(' obj type is %s' % type(obj))
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now:
|
|
|
|
>>> # Explicit constructor
|
|
>>> c = C((10,))
|
|
In __new__ with class <class 'C'>
|
|
In array_finalize:
|
|
self type is <class 'C'>
|
|
obj type is <type 'NoneType'>
|
|
In __init__ with class <class 'C'>
|
|
>>> # View casting
|
|
>>> a = np.arange(10)
|
|
>>> cast_a = a.view(C)
|
|
In array_finalize:
|
|
self type is <class 'C'>
|
|
obj type is <type 'numpy.ndarray'>
|
|
>>> # Slicing (example of new-from-template)
|
|
>>> cv = c[:1]
|
|
In array_finalize:
|
|
self type is <class 'C'>
|
|
obj type is <class 'C'>
|
|
|
|
The signature of ``__array_finalize__`` is::
|
|
|
|
def __array_finalize__(self, obj):
|
|
|
|
One sees that the ``super`` call, which goes to
|
|
``ndarray.__new__``, passes ``__array_finalize__`` the new object, of our
|
|
own class (``self``) as well as the object from which the view has been
|
|
taken (``obj``). As you can see from the output above, the ``self`` is
|
|
always a newly created instance of our subclass, and the type of ``obj``
|
|
differs for the three instance creation methods:
|
|
|
|
* When called from the explicit constructor, ``obj`` is ``None``
|
|
* When called from view casting, ``obj`` can be an instance of any
|
|
subclass of ndarray, including our own.
|
|
* When called in new-from-template, ``obj`` is another instance of our
|
|
own subclass, that we might use to update the new ``self`` instance.
|
|
|
|
Because ``__array_finalize__`` is the only method that always sees new
|
|
instances being created, it is the sensible place to fill in instance
|
|
defaults for new object attributes, among other tasks.
|
|
|
|
This may be clearer with an example.
|
|
|
|
Simple example - adding an extra attribute to ndarray
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
|
|
class InfoArray(np.ndarray):
|
|
|
|
def __new__(subtype, shape, dtype=float, buffer=None, offset=0,
|
|
strides=None, order=None, info=None):
|
|
# Create the ndarray instance of our type, given the usual
|
|
# ndarray input arguments. This will call the standard
|
|
# ndarray constructor, but return an object of our type.
|
|
# It also triggers a call to InfoArray.__array_finalize__
|
|
obj = super(InfoArray, subtype).__new__(subtype, shape, dtype,
|
|
buffer, offset, strides,
|
|
order)
|
|
# set the new 'info' attribute to the value passed
|
|
obj.info = info
|
|
# Finally, we must return the newly created object:
|
|
return obj
|
|
|
|
def __array_finalize__(self, obj):
|
|
# ``self`` is a new object resulting from
|
|
# ndarray.__new__(InfoArray, ...), therefore it only has
|
|
# attributes that the ndarray.__new__ constructor gave it -
|
|
# i.e. those of a standard ndarray.
|
|
#
|
|
# We could have got to the ndarray.__new__ call in 3 ways:
|
|
# From an explicit constructor - e.g. InfoArray():
|
|
# obj is None
|
|
# (we're in the middle of the InfoArray.__new__
|
|
# constructor, and self.info will be set when we return to
|
|
# InfoArray.__new__)
|
|
if obj is None: return
|
|
# From view casting - e.g arr.view(InfoArray):
|
|
# obj is arr
|
|
# (type(obj) can be InfoArray)
|
|
# From new-from-template - e.g infoarr[:3]
|
|
# type(obj) is InfoArray
|
|
#
|
|
# Note that it is here, rather than in the __new__ method,
|
|
# that we set the default value for 'info', because this
|
|
# method sees all creation of default objects - with the
|
|
# InfoArray.__new__ constructor, but also with
|
|
# arr.view(InfoArray).
|
|
self.info = getattr(obj, 'info', None)
|
|
# We do not need to return anything
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using the object looks like this:
|
|
|
|
>>> obj = InfoArray(shape=(3,)) # explicit constructor
|
|
>>> type(obj)
|
|
<class 'InfoArray'>
|
|
>>> obj.info is None
|
|
True
|
|
>>> obj = InfoArray(shape=(3,), info='information')
|
|
>>> obj.info
|
|
'information'
|
|
>>> v = obj[1:] # new-from-template - here - slicing
|
|
>>> type(v)
|
|
<class 'InfoArray'>
|
|
>>> v.info
|
|
'information'
|
|
>>> arr = np.arange(10)
|
|
>>> cast_arr = arr.view(InfoArray) # view casting
|
|
>>> type(cast_arr)
|
|
<class 'InfoArray'>
|
|
>>> cast_arr.info is None
|
|
True
|
|
|
|
This class isn't very useful, because it has the same constructor as the
|
|
bare ndarray object, including passing in buffers and shapes and so on.
|
|
We would probably prefer the constructor to be able to take an already
|
|
formed ndarray from the usual numpy calls to ``np.array`` and return an
|
|
object.
|
|
|
|
Slightly more realistic example - attribute added to existing array
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Here is a class that takes a standard ndarray that already exists, casts
|
|
as our type, and adds an extra attribute.
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
|
|
class RealisticInfoArray(np.ndarray):
|
|
|
|
def __new__(cls, input_array, info=None):
|
|
# Input array is an already formed ndarray instance
|
|
# We first cast to be our class type
|
|
obj = np.asarray(input_array).view(cls)
|
|
# add the new attribute to the created instance
|
|
obj.info = info
|
|
# Finally, we must return the newly created object:
|
|
return obj
|
|
|
|
def __array_finalize__(self, obj):
|
|
# see InfoArray.__array_finalize__ for comments
|
|
if obj is None: return
|
|
self.info = getattr(obj, 'info', None)
|
|
|
|
|
|
So:
|
|
|
|
>>> arr = np.arange(5)
|
|
>>> obj = RealisticInfoArray(arr, info='information')
|
|
>>> type(obj)
|
|
<class 'RealisticInfoArray'>
|
|
>>> obj.info
|
|
'information'
|
|
>>> v = obj[1:]
|
|
>>> type(v)
|
|
<class 'RealisticInfoArray'>
|
|
>>> v.info
|
|
'information'
|
|
|
|
.. _array-ufunc:
|
|
|
|
``__array_ufunc__`` for ufuncs
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 1.13
|
|
|
|
A subclass can override what happens when executing numpy ufuncs on it by
|
|
overriding the default ``ndarray.__array_ufunc__`` method. This method is
|
|
executed *instead* of the ufunc and should return either the result of the
|
|
operation, or :obj:`NotImplemented` if the operation requested is not
|
|
implemented.
|
|
|
|
The signature of ``__array_ufunc__`` is::
|
|
|
|
def __array_ufunc__(ufunc, method, *inputs, **kwargs):
|
|
|
|
- *ufunc* is the ufunc object that was called.
|
|
- *method* is a string indicating how the Ufunc was called, either
|
|
``"__call__"`` to indicate it was called directly, or one of its
|
|
:ref:`methods<ufuncs.methods>`: ``"reduce"``, ``"accumulate"``,
|
|
``"reduceat"``, ``"outer"``, or ``"at"``.
|
|
- *inputs* is a tuple of the input arguments to the ``ufunc``
|
|
- *kwargs* contains any optional or keyword arguments passed to the
|
|
function. This includes any ``out`` arguments, which are always
|
|
contained in a tuple.
|
|
|
|
A typical implementation would convert any inputs or outputs that are
|
|
instances of one's own class, pass everything on to a superclass using
|
|
``super()``, and finally return the results after possible
|
|
back-conversion. An example, taken from the test case
|
|
``test_ufunc_override_with_super`` in ``core/tests/test_umath.py``, is the
|
|
following.
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
input numpy as np
|
|
|
|
class A(np.ndarray):
|
|
def __array_ufunc__(self, ufunc, method, *inputs, out=None, **kwargs):
|
|
args = []
|
|
in_no = []
|
|
for i, input_ in enumerate(inputs):
|
|
if isinstance(input_, A):
|
|
in_no.append(i)
|
|
args.append(input_.view(np.ndarray))
|
|
else:
|
|
args.append(input_)
|
|
|
|
outputs = out
|
|
out_no = []
|
|
if outputs:
|
|
out_args = []
|
|
for j, output in enumerate(outputs):
|
|
if isinstance(output, A):
|
|
out_no.append(j)
|
|
out_args.append(output.view(np.ndarray))
|
|
else:
|
|
out_args.append(output)
|
|
kwargs['out'] = tuple(out_args)
|
|
else:
|
|
outputs = (None,) * ufunc.nout
|
|
|
|
info = {}
|
|
if in_no:
|
|
info['inputs'] = in_no
|
|
if out_no:
|
|
info['outputs'] = out_no
|
|
|
|
results = super(A, self).__array_ufunc__(ufunc, method,
|
|
*args, **kwargs)
|
|
if results is NotImplemented:
|
|
return NotImplemented
|
|
|
|
if method == 'at':
|
|
if isinstance(inputs[0], A):
|
|
inputs[0].info = info
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
if ufunc.nout == 1:
|
|
results = (results,)
|
|
|
|
results = tuple((np.asarray(result).view(A)
|
|
if output is None else output)
|
|
for result, output in zip(results, outputs))
|
|
if results and isinstance(results[0], A):
|
|
results[0].info = info
|
|
|
|
return results[0] if len(results) == 1 else results
|
|
|
|
So, this class does not actually do anything interesting: it just
|
|
converts any instances of its own to regular ndarray (otherwise, we'd
|
|
get infinite recursion!), and adds an ``info`` dictionary that tells
|
|
which inputs and outputs it converted. Hence, e.g.,
|
|
|
|
>>> a = np.arange(5.).view(A)
|
|
>>> b = np.sin(a)
|
|
>>> b.info
|
|
{'inputs': [0]}
|
|
>>> b = np.sin(np.arange(5.), out=(a,))
|
|
>>> b.info
|
|
{'outputs': [0]}
|
|
>>> a = np.arange(5.).view(A)
|
|
>>> b = np.ones(1).view(A)
|
|
>>> c = a + b
|
|
>>> c.info
|
|
{'inputs': [0, 1]}
|
|
>>> a += b
|
|
>>> a.info
|
|
{'inputs': [0, 1], 'outputs': [0]}
|
|
|
|
Note that another approach would be to to use ``getattr(ufunc,
|
|
methods)(*inputs, **kwargs)`` instead of the ``super`` call. For this example,
|
|
the result would be identical, but there is a difference if another operand
|
|
also defines ``__array_ufunc__``. E.g., lets assume that we evalulate
|
|
``np.add(a, b)``, where ``b`` is an instance of another class ``B`` that has
|
|
an override. If you use ``super`` as in the example,
|
|
``ndarray.__array_ufunc__`` will notice that ``b`` has an override, which
|
|
means it cannot evaluate the result itself. Thus, it will return
|
|
`NotImplemented` and so will our class ``A``. Then, control will be passed
|
|
over to ``b``, which either knows how to deal with us and produces a result,
|
|
or does not and returns `NotImplemented`, raising a ``TypeError``.
|
|
|
|
If instead, we replace our ``super`` call with ``getattr(ufunc, method)``, we
|
|
effectively do ``np.add(a.view(np.ndarray), b)``. Again, ``B.__array_ufunc__``
|
|
will be called, but now it sees an ``ndarray`` as the other argument. Likely,
|
|
it will know how to handle this, and return a new instance of the ``B`` class
|
|
to us. Our example class is not set up to handle this, but it might well be
|
|
the best approach if, e.g., one were to re-implement ``MaskedArray`` using
|
|
``__array_ufunc__``.
|
|
|
|
As a final note: if the ``super`` route is suited to a given class, an
|
|
advantage of using it is that it helps in constructing class hierarchies.
|
|
E.g., suppose that our other class ``B`` also used the ``super`` in its
|
|
``__array_ufunc__`` implementation, and we created a class ``C`` that depended
|
|
on both, i.e., ``class C(A, B)`` (with, for simplicity, not another
|
|
``__array_ufunc__`` override). Then any ufunc on an instance of ``C`` would
|
|
pass on to ``A.__array_ufunc__``, the ``super`` call in ``A`` would go to
|
|
``B.__array_ufunc__``, and the ``super`` call in ``B`` would go to
|
|
``ndarray.__array_ufunc__``, thus allowing ``A`` and ``B`` to collaborate.
|
|
|
|
.. _array-wrap:
|
|
|
|
``__array_wrap__`` for ufuncs and other functions
|
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Prior to numpy 1.13, the behaviour of ufuncs could only be tuned using
|
|
``__array_wrap__`` and ``__array_prepare__``. These two allowed one to
|
|
change the output type of a ufunc, but, in contrast to
|
|
``__array_ufunc__``, did not allow one to make any changes to the inputs.
|
|
It is hoped to eventually deprecate these, but ``__array_wrap__`` is also
|
|
used by other numpy functions and methods, such as ``squeeze``, so at the
|
|
present time is still needed for full functionality.
|
|
|
|
Conceptually, ``__array_wrap__`` "wraps up the action" in the sense of
|
|
allowing a subclass to set the type of the return value and update
|
|
attributes and metadata. Let's show how this works with an example. First
|
|
we return to the simpler example subclass, but with a different name and
|
|
some print statements:
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
|
|
class MySubClass(np.ndarray):
|
|
|
|
def __new__(cls, input_array, info=None):
|
|
obj = np.asarray(input_array).view(cls)
|
|
obj.info = info
|
|
return obj
|
|
|
|
def __array_finalize__(self, obj):
|
|
print('In __array_finalize__:')
|
|
print(' self is %s' % repr(self))
|
|
print(' obj is %s' % repr(obj))
|
|
if obj is None: return
|
|
self.info = getattr(obj, 'info', None)
|
|
|
|
def __array_wrap__(self, out_arr, context=None):
|
|
print('In __array_wrap__:')
|
|
print(' self is %s' % repr(self))
|
|
print(' arr is %s' % repr(out_arr))
|
|
# then just call the parent
|
|
return super(MySubClass, self).__array_wrap__(self, out_arr, context)
|
|
|
|
We run a ufunc on an instance of our new array:
|
|
|
|
>>> obj = MySubClass(np.arange(5), info='spam')
|
|
In __array_finalize__:
|
|
self is MySubClass([0, 1, 2, 3, 4])
|
|
obj is array([0, 1, 2, 3, 4])
|
|
>>> arr2 = np.arange(5)+1
|
|
>>> ret = np.add(arr2, obj)
|
|
In __array_wrap__:
|
|
self is MySubClass([0, 1, 2, 3, 4])
|
|
arr is array([1, 3, 5, 7, 9])
|
|
In __array_finalize__:
|
|
self is MySubClass([1, 3, 5, 7, 9])
|
|
obj is MySubClass([0, 1, 2, 3, 4])
|
|
>>> ret
|
|
MySubClass([1, 3, 5, 7, 9])
|
|
>>> ret.info
|
|
'spam'
|
|
|
|
Note that the ufunc (``np.add``) has called the ``__array_wrap__`` method
|
|
with arguments ``self`` as ``obj``, and ``out_arr`` as the (ndarray) result
|
|
of the addition. In turn, the default ``__array_wrap__``
|
|
(``ndarray.__array_wrap__``) has cast the result to class ``MySubClass``,
|
|
and called ``__array_finalize__`` - hence the copying of the ``info``
|
|
attribute. This has all happened at the C level.
|
|
|
|
But, we could do anything we wanted:
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
class SillySubClass(np.ndarray):
|
|
|
|
def __array_wrap__(self, arr, context=None):
|
|
return 'I lost your data'
|
|
|
|
>>> arr1 = np.arange(5)
|
|
>>> obj = arr1.view(SillySubClass)
|
|
>>> arr2 = np.arange(5)
|
|
>>> ret = np.multiply(obj, arr2)
|
|
>>> ret
|
|
'I lost your data'
|
|
|
|
So, by defining a specific ``__array_wrap__`` method for our subclass,
|
|
we can tweak the output from ufuncs. The ``__array_wrap__`` method
|
|
requires ``self``, then an argument - which is the result of the ufunc -
|
|
and an optional parameter *context*. This parameter is returned by
|
|
ufuncs as a 3-element tuple: (name of the ufunc, arguments of the ufunc,
|
|
domain of the ufunc), but is not set by other numpy functions. Though,
|
|
as seen above, it is possible to do otherwise, ``__array_wrap__`` should
|
|
return an instance of its containing class. See the masked array
|
|
subclass for an implementation.
|
|
|
|
In addition to ``__array_wrap__``, which is called on the way out of the
|
|
ufunc, there is also an ``__array_prepare__`` method which is called on
|
|
the way into the ufunc, after the output arrays are created but before any
|
|
computation has been performed. The default implementation does nothing
|
|
but pass through the array. ``__array_prepare__`` should not attempt to
|
|
access the array data or resize the array, it is intended for setting the
|
|
output array type, updating attributes and metadata, and performing any
|
|
checks based on the input that may be desired before computation begins.
|
|
Like ``__array_wrap__``, ``__array_prepare__`` must return an ndarray or
|
|
subclass thereof or raise an error.
|
|
|
|
Extra gotchas - custom ``__del__`` methods and ndarray.base
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
One of the problems that ndarray solves is keeping track of memory
|
|
ownership of ndarrays and their views. Consider the case where we have
|
|
created an ndarray, ``arr`` and have taken a slice with ``v = arr[1:]``.
|
|
The two objects are looking at the same memory. NumPy keeps track of
|
|
where the data came from for a particular array or view, with the
|
|
``base`` attribute:
|
|
|
|
>>> # A normal ndarray, that owns its own data
|
|
>>> arr = np.zeros((4,))
|
|
>>> # In this case, base is None
|
|
>>> arr.base is None
|
|
True
|
|
>>> # We take a view
|
|
>>> v1 = arr[1:]
|
|
>>> # base now points to the array that it derived from
|
|
>>> v1.base is arr
|
|
True
|
|
>>> # Take a view of a view
|
|
>>> v2 = v1[1:]
|
|
>>> # base points to the view it derived from
|
|
>>> v2.base is v1
|
|
True
|
|
|
|
In general, if the array owns its own memory, as for ``arr`` in this
|
|
case, then ``arr.base`` will be None - there are some exceptions to this
|
|
- see the numpy book for more details.
|
|
|
|
The ``base`` attribute is useful in being able to tell whether we have
|
|
a view or the original array. This in turn can be useful if we need
|
|
to know whether or not to do some specific cleanup when the subclassed
|
|
array is deleted. For example, we may only want to do the cleanup if
|
|
the original array is deleted, but not the views. For an example of
|
|
how this can work, have a look at the ``memmap`` class in
|
|
``numpy.core``.
|
|
|
|
Subclassing and Downstream Compatibility
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
When sub-classing ``ndarray`` or creating duck-types that mimic the ``ndarray``
|
|
interface, it is your responsibility to decide how aligned your APIs will be
|
|
with those of numpy. For convenience, many numpy functions that have a corresponding
|
|
``ndarray`` method (e.g., ``sum``, ``mean``, ``take``, ``reshape``) work by checking
|
|
if the first argument to a function has a method of the same name. If it exists, the
|
|
method is called instead of coercing the arguments to a numpy array.
|
|
|
|
For example, if you want your sub-class or duck-type to be compatible with
|
|
numpy's ``sum`` function, the method signature for this object's ``sum`` method
|
|
should be the following:
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
def sum(self, axis=None, dtype=None, out=None, keepdims=False):
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
This is the exact same method signature for ``np.sum``, so now if a user calls
|
|
``np.sum`` on this object, numpy will call the object's own ``sum`` method and
|
|
pass in these arguments enumerated above in the signature, and no errors will
|
|
be raised because the signatures are completely compatible with each other.
|
|
|
|
If, however, you decide to deviate from this signature and do something like this:
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
def sum(self, axis=None, dtype=None):
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
This object is no longer compatible with ``np.sum`` because if you call ``np.sum``,
|
|
it will pass in unexpected arguments ``out`` and ``keepdims``, causing a TypeError
|
|
to be raised.
|
|
|
|
If you wish to maintain compatibility with numpy and its subsequent versions (which
|
|
might add new keyword arguments) but do not want to surface all of numpy's arguments,
|
|
your function's signature should accept ``**kwargs``. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. testcode::
|
|
|
|
def sum(self, axis=None, dtype=None, **unused_kwargs):
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
This object is now compatible with ``np.sum`` again because any extraneous arguments
|
|
(i.e. keywords that are not ``axis`` or ``dtype``) will be hidden away in the
|
|
``**unused_kwargs`` parameter.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|